January 24, 2016

Is the David Bowie 'Constellation' A Stellar Hoax?


                                                                           



The death of David Bowie has caused people to remember the artist in many different ways. Only recently a request for a Bowie Constellation was reportedly put forward by Belgian radio channel Studio Brussels and the MIRA Public Observatory. Can this be done at all? And where can we see it?

Anyone watching the night sky will try to make out patterns in the stars. This aids in navigation and, over millennia, has allowed peoples to create myths and stories within the stars, making the sky a place that is sacred and important to them. 

Modern astronomers, however, have a more pragmatic view of the constellations. They have defined 88 regions in the sky as "constellations", including those of the zodiac. Astronomers use the constellations as we on Earth use countries – to describe where something is located. 

On Earth, we can state where we live by giving the longitude and latitude, which is similar to describing a location in the sky with the 'right ascension' and 'declination' used by astronomers. But it’s useful to be able to refer to a star in Cancer, say, just as we might first tell someone that we are from Britain, India or the US. 

So could we add a new one? Unfortunately, there is no space in the sky for a new constellation, everything has already been covered. Therefore, there is no process to request a new constellation. Additionally, the International Astronomical Union responsible for the definition of the boundaries of the constellations never received a request

The 'David Bowie constellation' was defined by the stars making up the unique lightning bolt from Bowie’s 1973’s Aladdin Sane album cover. That would actually be something that astronomers call an 'asterism', a shape made by stars, and not a region in the sky – or constellation – at all. 

The asterism would encompass a vast region, starting with the brightest star in Virgo, Spica, 10 times more massive and four times hotter at its surface than our Sun. It then encompasses Sigma Librae, Zeta Centauri and SAO 204132, Sigma Octantis and Beta Trianguli Australis, near the Celestial South Pole. It would contain parts of the zodiac, some considerably bright, named and well-known stars – but would also cross eight constellations.

Overall, the 'David Bowie constellation' was a description of an asterism linked to recent events that spiralled out of control through misinterpretation. What it shows is that what we see in the stars is very much influenced by what happens to the people seeing the stars and a good example of 'cultural astronomy'. But even if it isn’t a constellation, this asterism does offer us a chance to use it as a way to explore what lies within it.  

The asterism, for example, includes the globular cluster Omega Centauri, which is nearly 16,000 light years away and has around 10 million stars. It is so large that it is even thought to be the remains of a disrupted dwarf galaxy

It would also include the closest and brightest barred spiral galaxy to us – M83, also known as the Southern Pinwheel galaxy. It is 15m light years from us and possibly shows indications of a double nucleus, making it a fascinating object for astronomers. 

Depending on where you live, you would struggle to see the entire asterism. At latitudes similar to those in Europe and the US, the tip of the lightning bolt would always be below the horizon. But while observing the south to south-eastern horizon at the end of January in the early morning hours, enjoying the morning planets display, you would be able to see the top of the asterism starting at Spica. 

However, its huge extent in the sky – ranging from declinations of -11 degrees to -80 degrees – would ensure that nearly anyone on Earth further south than Svalbard at 80 degrees north, could see at least part of the Bowie asterism. 

So enjoy observing the stars, try and find the unofficial Bowie asterism and see if you can make your own to help you explore the wonders in the sky and learn more about the stories in the sky and what they can say about us.The Conversation 

By Daniel Brown, Lecturer in Astronomy, Nottingham Trent University.

With many thanks to Science Alert.


                                                                    


See also:

Remembering David Bowie
 Dixie: Elvis Presley — An Anthem Of The American South
The Rolling Stones’ 'Satisfaction' Was The Result Of A Faulty Amp
MC Escher: An Enigma Behind an Illusion                                                          
Elizabeth Taylor Quotes
Dwight Yoakam Names His Top Five David Bowie Songs
David Bowie ‘I Can’t Give Everything Away’ Video Released 
Why David Bowie's "Labyrinth" Is So Memorable
David Bowie’s Rejected ‘The Gouster’ Album To Be Released
David Bowie's Personal Art Collection Auctioned Off For $30 Million









                                                                      

January 22, 2016

Sir John Monash: Grantlee Kieza’s Biography


                                                                     



                                                                   

                                                                 

Few places of honour underline the recurring tragedy of war more graphically than the Australian National Memorial at Villers-Bretonneux in France. This sacred ground commemorates the sacrifice of Australian and other Allied soldiers in the Great War of 1914-18. But as you climb to the top of the tower that overlooks the memorial and surrounding countryside, scene of a great Australian triumph in 1918, it becomes obvious the immeasurable sacrifice of the fallen did not conclude a ‘‘war to end war’’.

Chunks of masonry are missing. Bullet holes scar the walls. This is the result of German heavy infantry weapons being deployed in 1940 to dislodge the French defenders of the memorial during World War II, as the Wehrmacht advanced in the west. On the fall of Paris in June 1940, a Wehrmacht officer observed that the campaign to take the French capital had lasted 26 years.

But in 1918, Australian infantry had won brilliant battlefield engagements against the Germans, blunting Erich Ludendorff’s final offensive. Villers-Bretonneux was one such victory, still being commemorated in the township today with Australian place names and a schoolhouse sign that says: “Never Forget the Australians”. 

Le Hamel was another striking success. In both battles, the Australian commander was General John Monash.

Monash is now the fabric of Australian legend. He is acknowledged variously by having public institutions from a freeway to a university named after him. He appears on the $100 note, and he is widely regarded as the personification of Australian leadership and martial skills in battle and dedicated public service in peace.

In Monash: The Soldier who Shaped Australia, Grantlee Kieza pursues the man and in so doing projects the legend.

The Monash family was originally of Prussian Jewish stock. His father, Louis, and mother, Bertha, emigrated to Melbourne and settled in St Kilda in 1864. A son was born on June 27, 1865, and reported in the newspaper as John Monash, the family having decided to anglicise their name.

Life for the newly arrived Monash family was not without pressures, particularly financial. In hopes of bettering the family circumstances, they moved north to Jerilderie in the Riverina where Louis opened a general store. It is at Jerilderie where one of the strangest encounters in Australian history occurs. 

The young John Monash meets Ned Kelly.

According to Monash’s later accounts, his ­father is in need of a new horse and buys four white ponies from young Kelly; Ned takes them to the Monash home. Louis is said to have boasted that he even managed to trick Kelly out of his money. John Monash will later tell audiences that Kelly gave him a shilling to hold his horse. 

Kelly and his gang, he says, would have made good soldiers. Pondering this observation, one can only imagine the potential heroism of Ned and his brother Daniel Kelly, Steve Hart and Joe Byrne charging with the 4th Light Horse at Beersheba.

                                                                 



                                                                     

Monash’s mother was the great influence on the young man growing up. While his father struggled with various businesses, Bertha never lost sight of the importance of education and made certain young John attended the best schools, through Scotch College to the University of Melbourne. Monash was ambitious and never left anyone in doubt as to his talents, but his mother constantly reinforced the need to succeed in this new Australian society. Twice over, the Monash family could be considered outsiders, being German and Jewish. Thus the need was always there to work just that much harder to ensure success.
But more than success, Bertha was a civilising influence on her son, introducing him to the arts and seeing him develop as a fine pianist.

At university, Monash was gregarious and popular but he struggled with different subjects from time to time. The university militia, however, was no chore, and he excelled, rising steadily through the ranks.

But the great flaw in the young man who emerged in Melbourne society as both an engineer of note and a militia officer of promise was his relentless womanising. His most passionate and notorious affair was with the wife of one of his subordinates on a construction project, Fred Gabriel. Annie Gabriel may well have been the love of Monash’s life but their tempestuous relationship nearly ruined both of them. Kieza draws attention to one spectacular incident as the lovers meet:

As they canoodled, Fred comes hurtling over a hill above them like a charging cavalryman. Monash is sent tumbling as the two men grapple over Monash’s walking stick. Annie screams in terror but Fred drags her down to the Johnston Street Bridge …. However as Fred, “very violent in his language”, pushes Annie onto a tram, Monash jumps on as well, and the three combatants go at it hammer and tongs in a furious row, startling passengers, until all three jump off at Smith Street.
A fracas like that could be taken from a ­biography of Charlie Sheen.

Kieza is the author of 10 books, including a biography of Australian airman Bert Hinkler. He has written for newspapers including The Australian, Brisbane’s TheCourier Mail and Sydney’s The Daily Telegraph . His style reflects his profession: clear and accessible. It makes for easy reading, notwithstanding the occasional lapse into florid language.

Nonetheless, the great strength of Monash is that Kieza has made the life of Australia’s greatest general open to a broad new audience. It is a decade or more since a major biography of Monash was published, and this well-crafted and extensively documented volume appropriately coincides with the centenary of World War I.

Monash’s success as an innovative civil engineer, introducing new products and processes, brought prosperity, and marriage to Hannah Victoria Moss. A greater degree of stability, though, did not stop his eye from wandering. The outbreak of war, however, changed ­Monash’s life every bit as much as it served to change Australia. As a brigadier, he commanded Australian troops on the Gallipoli Peninsula.

It is sometimes claimed that Australia had no reason to take part in World War I. Even if one ignores the requirement for imperial defence, this is nonsense. Germany was present in the Pacific in the formidable capabilities of the East Asia Squadron in China, and there were German colonies in New Guinea and at Rabaul. Indeed it was the threat posed by the German cruiser Emden to the Anzac convoys that caused HMAS Sydney to pursue and sink the German raider off the Cocos Islands in November 1914.

Australia had its own national interests to consider in supporting Britain and the empire. But the Gallipoli campaign was, of course, an epic failure.

 Monash’s performance was not regarded highly by his superiors, but the Australian war correspondent and later historian Charles Bean recognised the essence of Monash’s leadership skills. Bean noted that he would make a better divisional than a brigade commander, and a better corps commander than a divisional one. Bean was one of Monash’s most acerbic critics, partly a reflection of his ­latent anti-Semitism, but there can be no doubt that his assessment of Monash was peculiarly insightful.

Precisely as Bean predicted, Monash shone in command on the Western Front over the years 1917-18. He handled Australian troops with great skill and care, and his reputation grew, including with superiors such as Field Marshal Douglas Haig. In 1918, at the insistence of the Australian government, especially prime minister Billy Hughes, the five Australian divisions were grouped together in a corps and Monash was named commander in May.

At Le Hamel, Monash brought all the skills of generalship to bear. He had predicted a battle lasting 90 minutes (it lasted 93), and the combined arms assault in the pre-dawn hours saw the Germans routed. Monash deployed a creeping artillery barrage, air support and tanks to deliver a knockout blow. More significantly, it was the first time American troops had fought on the Western Front and several companies of “Black Jack” Pershing’s infantry served successfully under Australian command. The battle was fought on Independence Day, July 4, 1918.

British prime minister Lloyd George maintained that if Monash had been in command of all British armies on the Western Front rather than Haig, the war would have ended a year earlier. 

                                                                             


This assertion has always been open to doubt, given the intensity of the German U-boat campaign in the Atlantic in early 1917; the fact that the French army had not recovered from the bloodletting of the previous three years and would see some units mutiny in 1917; the Americans had not yet mobilised; and Czarist Russia was knocked out of the war at the end of 1917. Nonetheless, Monash’s reputation for meticulous planning and for superb execution of battle plans caused him to be looked on favourably by many, including George V.

Kieza’s biography is nowhere near as adulatory as Roland Perry’s work of 2004, Monash: The Outsider Who Won a War, but it does accept many of Monash’s assessments of his own strengths, as detailed in both of his accounts: The Australian Victories in France in 1918 and War Letters of General Monash.

Kieza might have been more searching of his subject but it is difficult to disagree with his endorsement of Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery’s more nuanced assessment: ‘‘I would name Sir John Monash as the best general on the Western Front in Europe; he possessed real creative originality, and the war might well have been won sooner, and certainly with fewer casualties, had Haig been relieved of his command and Monash appointed to command the British armies in his place.’’

No other Australian general has ever achieved Monash’s standing. On his death in Melbourne in 1931, an estimated 300,000 citizens lined the streets for his funeral procession. ­Monash’s reputation for judgment and capacity has never been seriously challenged, certainly not in Geoffrey Serle’s benchmark 1982 biography, John Monash, which was based on the Monash family papers.

The subtitle of Kieza’s book, The Soldier Who Shaped Australia, is perceptive: Monash continues to reflect the best in the Australian character. In war he cared for his troops, even ensuring hot meals for frontline soldiers. In the peacetime he was visionary, particularly while running the State Electricity Commission of Victoria.

But perhaps Monash’s greatest achievement was to overcome the poisonous influence of anti-Semitism. Certainly, the photograph of George V knighting him on the battlefield ­dispelled any lingering doubts as to Monash’s talents and loyalties. He had often been the victim of whispering campaigns but the knighthood represented accomplishment and acknowledgment.

Monash himself demonstrated an extraordinary generosity of spirit, as Keiza records:
At a dinner given by the Maccabean Society in London’s Oxford Street on 4 March 1919, Monash tells his audience, including [Generals] Birdwood and White, that he finds himself “the object of considerable curiosity, because he belongs to the Jewish race” and because before the war he did not belong to the “profession of arms”. Yet he puts forward the best picture of Australia he can, saying to considerable applause that in his native country such a thing as religious discrimination is unknown. In his recollection there has never been an obstacle of any kind placed in the way of any Australian Jew in regard to career.

This is a remarkable statement and emphasised the significance of tolerance in the infant Australian Commonwealth. If we are largely free of the anti-Semitism which has disfigured so many other societies, then Monash must be said to have made a primary contribution.
Monash deserves to stand alone. Kieza has produced a sympathetic but honest portrait of Australia’s greatest and most influential ­general.

Stephen Loosley is chairman of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in Canberra and author of Machine Rules: A Political Primer.
Monash: The Soldier Who Shaped Australia
By Grantlee Kieza
ABC Books, 714pp, $39.99 (HB)

                                                                      



By Stephen Loosely
With many thanks to The Australian

Beersheba stamp picture credit:News
Related:

Neil Oliver -The Memorial: Beyond The Anzac Legend And Now The Renovated WWI Gallery Re-Opens

Russell Crowe's "The Water Diviner" Is Not Complete Fiction

Ned Kelly

A Fortunate Life - The Biography of A.B. Facey

Anzac Day - 2015 

ANZAC Day - 2016


 More on literature:
'The Great Gatsby': Seven Life Lessons
Is this pasted note Jane Austen's Last Missive? 
Charles Dickens: Literary Legend 
Spain Finds Don Quixote Writer Cervantes' Tomb In Madrid 
Where Do Fairy Tales Come From? 
Winnie The Pooh Named Kids' Favourite Book 
The Top 10 Shakespeare Scenes 
The Best and Worst of Hollywood's Book Adaptations? 
Is This Pasted Note Jane Austen's Final Missive? 
Sherlock Holmes: Arthur Conan Doyle’s Hero Still Going Strong 
Alice in Wonderland at 150 
Father Of Anne Frank Listed As Co-Author Of Diary To Extend Copyright
Julia Child’s French Cooking Book Was A Trail Blazer 
Fairy Tales Are Grim! 










January 21, 2016

Dwight Yoakam Names His Top Five David Bowie Songs


                                                                       



                                                                      
It may seem like an odd pairing, but despite some pretty vast differences Dwight Yoakam and David Bowie do have some things in common.

Yoakam is a pioneering country music star from Kentucky who’s known for his honky tonk/cowpunk tunes and tight, flared and faded blue jeans and his role as Doyle Hargraves in the 1996 drama “Sling Blade.” 

Bowie was a beloved English international superstar, a music chameleon embedded in pop culture for over five decades and who starred as the Goblin King in 1986’s “Labyrinth.”
                                                      

Both artists had a hunger for music and cinema, and, as they would come to find, a mutual admiration for Elvis.

                                                                      

Though Yoakam is currently out on tour in support of his 19th studio album, “Second Hand Heart,” which came out last April, Bowie’s sudden passing last week was at the forefront of his mind. Soon after hearing the sad news, Yoakam said he put on and turned up the track “Rebel Rebel.”

“I love the guitars on that and took inspiration from that,” the 59-year-old said during a phone interview before he returns to City National Grove of Anaheim on Sunday. “He was an artist all the way until the end, purely and truly in every sense of the word. 

He should be an inspiration for all musical artists. He showed a lot of respect to the audience and was grateful for the gift that the artists are given in being able to make music and continue to have the opportunity to express themselves, of course in David’s case, to a massive and wide audience. It’s a lesson in just remembering to be grateful.”

Like so many others who helped Bowie’s final album, “Blackstar” – delivered just days before his death, reach No. 1 on the Billboard 200 chart for the first time in his extensive career, Yoakam sat and devoured every last song.

“Clearly he was aware at that point of his mortality throughout the process of creating ‘Blackstar,’” Yoakam said.


 “He did it all with such dignity and grace and I think that’s an absolutely overwhelming illustration of what the definition of an artist is, through and through and in David’s case, he did that all the way to his dying breath, he just kept giving art to audiences.”

Having been a fan for years, Yoakam finally got to meet Bowie after a show at the Hollywood Athletic Club during the British star’s Earthling Tour in 1997. The two kicked back and talked about Bowie working with Marc Bolan of T.Rex and Yoakam asked Bowie about Elvis, since he’s one of Yoakam’s influences and Bowie and the King shared the same birthday.

Bowie told him about the first time he saw Elvis perform live in 1971 and mentioned that just six months before Elvis’ death in 1977, the King had called him out of the blue to discuss Bowie possibly producing his next album.
                                                              

“That was based on Elvis having heard Bowie’s ‘Golden Years’ and I thought ‘Oh my God, it’s a tragedy that he was never able to make that,’” Yoakam said. “I couldn’t even imagine 1977 David Bowie producing Elvis. It would have been fantastic. It has to be one of the greatest tragedies in pop music history that it didn’t happen, one of the biggest missed opportunities.”

                                                                  


Aside from having Bowie on his mind, Yoakam, who is a frequent player in Orange County, said he’s excited about bringing new music to Anaheim this time around. He’s already incorporated songs like the album title track “Second Hand Heart,” “Dreams of Clay” and a definite Elvis-inspired cut, “Liar,” into recent set lists.

Yoakam says what he plays on a given night depends on his mood. That could include the dancy new track “The Big Time,” which he’ll sometimes swap out for “A Heart Like Mine” off his 2012 record “3 Pears,” which was co-produced by Beck. Whatever he decides to throw in at the last minute, his solid brood of backing players is more than capable of keeping up.

“They’re pretty good about that,” he said with a laugh. “You know, in spite of me, they manage somehow.”

He and the band had a lot of fun filming the music video for “Liar” during rush hour traffic over the summer on the Sunset Strip, a place that holds significance for Yoakam’s 30-year career.


                                                                  
“We got funny looks from people,” he said about filming the video on the street during such a busy time of day. “We had a few near misses with Elliot James, who is playing all of the keyboards live now, he was hanging out of a car window playing tambourine and there were a couple of times we almost lost him. It was a real kick to do that all these years later, just down the street from the Whisky.”

During the filming for the video, Yoakam said that he realized it had been nearly three decades since the Roxy on the Sunset Strip had hosted his first record release party for his 1986 debut, “Guitars, Cadillacs, Etc., Etc.” That record featured his popular cover of Johnny Horton’s “Honky Tonk Man.” Since then, Yoakam has covered numerous artists, everyone from Elvis and Buck Owens to Queen and the Clash.



                                                                    
On “Second Hand Heart” he “punks out” the traditional American folk song “Man of Constant Sorrow” and put his own spin on Anthony Crawford’s “V’s of Birds,” a song he has yet to perform live off of the new album.
“I was in love with that song from the moment I heard it back in the mid-’90s,” Yoakam said of the latter cut. “It’s one of the only songs that I’ve come across that I’ve thought to myself, ‘Wow, why didn’t I think of that?’ The idea of looking up in the sky and seeing birds fly in that formation and headed south. It was one of the more literate lyrics that I had heard in a long time. So, I was always a bit envious of such an original kind of take on that phrase. It’s a very pretty song with a great melody.”

For now, however, Yoakam said he will continue to listen to a lot of Bowie, including his favorite, “Rebel Rebel,” followed by “Golden Years,” “Jean Genie,” “Heroes” and a rare B-side cover of Chuck Berry’s “Around and Around,” which Bowie recorded as “Round and Round” in the early ’70s.
                                                                 


                

“It would have been great to have been able to work with him,” Yoakam said, but much like Bowie’s collaboration with Elvis, “It just wasn’t to be.”

By Kelli Skye Fadroski

With many thanks to The Orange County Register 

More at The Guardian

[....]
Since Bowie’s death last week, another link with Elvis has been uncovered. An Elvis song called Black Star – which remained unreleased for decades after being recorded in 1960 – was cited as a possible inspiration for his farewell album. The song’s lyrics say: “Every man has a black star / A black star over his shoulder / And when a man sees his black star / He knows his time, his time has come.”
[....]

                                                             

See also:
Remembering David Bowie

 Dixie: Elvis Presley — An Anthem Of The American South

Dwight Yoakam’s Rock Roots

Elvis Is Touring Australia In 2017, Sort Of

David Bowie's Personal Art Collection Auctioned Off For $30 Million