March 09, 2015

Daniel Timms’ Stroke Of Genius:BiVACOR Artificial Heart



                                                                        



HE whispered in a Scottish drawl: “You wanna see somethin’ cool?” 
Professor John Fraser has been an intensive care specialist for two decades. He established the Critical Care Research Group at Brisbane’s Prince Charles Hospital in 2004. He’s seen cool things before: heart transplants; machines that can rebuild a blackened human lung before your eyes; bodies of children wrenched from the cold and still grip of beyond.


It was three years ago when he whispered the invitation, at a backyard barbecue at his house in Brisbane’s northern suburbs. We were eating sausages, talking about outdoor music systems controlled by one’s mobile phone. The things we humans can accomplish. Our wives went to school together. I’d known him for 13 years, long enough to know that when he asks if you would like to see something cool he’s not about to show you a Harley-Davidson motorcycle.
John led me into his house, up a set of stairs to the main bedroom. He said a genius had moved into the office next to his at Prince Charles, an obsessive young biomedical engineer who rarely ate, rarely slept, spent his days and nights clanging and banging and grinding away at strange metal objects. John was privy to the best-kept secret in Australian medical ­science. His name was Daniel Timms and inside his small solitary office in Chermside, Brisbane, he was building a miracle.

John unzipped a suitcase which lay in the middle of his bed. He had just returned from overseas. The surgeon dug his hand into a pile of travel clothes and pulled out a pair of dark green men’s underpants, moth-eaten and frayed. “Here you go,” he said, placing the underpants in my hands. “Don’t worry, they’re clean.”

The underpants wrapped and protected something metal, lightweight and spherical, not much smaller than a tennis ball, weighing about 500g. Made of titanium, with clean design lines, it was so perfect and neat and unfamiliar that it felt alien, a product not of our Earth, not of our time. 

The BiVACOR,” John said. A miracle small enough to be implanted inside a child so that they can walk, run, eat, drink, dance and live fully independently without a human heart and without a pulse.


An early prototype for the world’s first long-term total replacement for a failing human heart. A machine with one perpetually moving part that could send oxygen and nutrients to human blood cells via a rotating disc levitating in a magnetic field. A thing of magic. A machine that could gift the 17 million people each year across the world who die from heart disease – the world’s number one killer – another 10 or more years of quality life. A miracle small enough to be implanted inside a child so that they can walk, run, eat, drink, dance and live fully independently without a human heart and without a pulse.

“Without a pulse?” I said.
John nodded. And I said two words that Dan Timms has heard repeatedly these past 15 years; words so blindingly and maddeningly pessimistic they have come to fuel his relentless drive, two words up in lights beside the long night road of his endeavour.
“That’s impossible,” I said.

THERE was a time when men who wanted to fly threw themselves off medieval European towers with vulture feathers strapped to their arms. They were awed and terrified by Mother Nature. They respected her designs, mimicked her wondrous blueprint all the way down to their face-first solid-ground oblivion. In December 1903, the Wright brothers took human flight in a machine that tore up Mother Nature’s blueprint, burnt her designs in a petrol engine powering two wooden propellers. They bettered Mother Nature. A vulture can’t fly 13,000km from Houston, Texas, to Brisbane, Queensland, but a 747 can do it in 15 hours and 25 minutes. And here’s Dan Timms, far above clouds, flying home to make medical history.

Below:Leonardo da Vinci’s Ornithopter flying machine designed in the 1400s.
                                                                     

                                                                      

He remembers where this all began. The closest thing he had to an apple dropping on his head, 15 years ago or more. A PhD engineering student at Brisbane’s Queensland University of Technology with a personal biomedical interest in the artificial heart. “Early, early, early, at the very beginning,” he says. “I wrote down a rough drawing on a piece of paper.”

A private sketch of an image in his mind. A machine inside a body where a human heart once was. A metal housing for a levitated rotating disc. Large blades on one side of the spinning disc continuously pushing oxygen-rich blood to the body’s arterial tree. Small blades on the other side driving returning blood to the lungs to replenish oxygen. Perpetual. Perfect. He scribbled two words beneath his sketch: “F..k yeah!”

“I had no idea what was required to actually make that device, but it was an early version of what would become the BiVACOR,” he says. He smiles, wistful and reflective. “Dad was still alive at that point.”

THE morning of January 8, 2015, and Timms descends a set of stairs leading to an operating theatre in QUT’s Medical Engineering Research Facility at Prince Charles Hospital. The 36-year-old slips into blue scrubs and enters the theatre where a team of heart ­surgeons, engineers and researchers from the hospital – most of them volunteering their time – will implant his BiVACOR artificial heart inside the sedated sheep ­resting on a steel operating table in the centre of the room.


 John Fraser is here, helping a team of ­surgeons monitor and prep the sheep. In the middle of it all stands Dr Billy Cohn, a pioneering American heart surgeon from the Texas Heart Institute in Houston who flew into ­Brisbane the day before. Beside Cohn stands Steve Parnis, arguably the most experienced cardiac animal surgeon in the world, also from the Texas Heart Institute.
“Mother Nature’s a bitch,” says Cohn. “But she has things she will tolerate and things she will not tolerate, and we’ve got to find those secrets. We’ve done 80-some odd cows in ­Houston with various iterations of continuous flow pumps, and the last seven of them were with the BiVACOR. We don’t know if we can do a sheep. The sheep represents children. No artificial heart has ever been small enough to go inside a child. The place where the heart is in a normal sheep is much smaller and much more restrictive than an adult human’s. If we can get this device to fit inside a sheep and work, it means small women, it means children.”
It means a leap in global medical science.


By Trent Dalton
With many thanks to The Australian






Sarah Brightman: The First Soprano In Space


                                                                          



                                                                     
SARAH Brightman is recounting the time she fell a little bit in love with a starship trooper — a real one, not the fictional hero of the glitter-strewn 1978 hit she had with Hot Gossip. He was Buzz Aldrin, the second man on the moon. They met on a boat in Seattle. 
“He was amazing. He just did not stop talking,” she says, her eyes glazing over at the memory. “It was just me and him on a yacht watching an air show.”

The meeting had been arranged after Brightman used some of her multimillion-pound fortune to buy a notebook that Aldrin had used on the moon. He scrawled “these notes were made by me on the moon” then signed his name. The page is now framed and has pride of place on the wall of her Los Angeles home, alongside a collection of posters from Soviet space missions that she has bought at auction over the years.

In six months’ time the wispy English soprano famous for her roles in Cats and The Phantom of the Opera will have a chance to gather some space memorabilia for a Phantom of her own.

On September 1 she will blast off in a Soyuz space rocket from the Baikonur cosmodrome in the deserts of Kazakhstan. After a six-hour flight she will spend 10 days aboard the International Space Station and will become the first professional musician to perform in space.

It really is happening. It is not a joke, as everyone assumed when she revealed her plans more than two years ago. Neither, she insists, is it an expensive publicity stunt.

“There are far better ways, and much less expensive ways, to do a PR exercise,” she sighs.
We met on Friday morning, during a break in her cosmonaut training, in her Manhattan apartment, a modestly expensive 39th-floor pad right by New York’s biggest bus station. The floor-to-ceiling windows frame a view of the new world trade centre glistening in the clean winter light on the tip of the island.

The room looks like a hotel suite, apart from the Korg electric piano in the corner with a book of Estelle Liebling vocal exercises propped on the music stand.
Brightman bought the place unseen after being given a tour via the internet. Then, for 18 months, she forgot she owned it. “I was staying in a hotel here with a friend,” she explains. “We had been out to lunch and I said, ‘For goodness’ sake, what am I doing? We’re staying in a hotel and I’ve got an apartment here.’ I went and got the keys from the realtor and came in and had a look. I was thinking of selling it. I wasn’t quite sure. I came in and went, ‘This is absolutely fantastic’ — it has this view, this light. I don’t spend much time in it, but when I do it’s a godsend.”

Brightman, 54, really is rich enough to forget about buying a Manhattan apartment. She has sold 30m records globally, ranking her as the world’s top-selling soprano. Her duet with the blind tenor Andrea Bocelli, Time to Say Goodbye, has sold 12m copies worldwide, ranking it alongside the Beatles’ I Want to Hold Your Hand and cheesy hits such as the Village People’s YMCA.

For many of us her name will always conjure up images of the bird-like young woman with a bubble perm perched on the knee of a lank-haired Andrew Lloyd Webber. She was only 23 in 1984 when she married the composer, who was 12 years her senior. He had left his wife to be with her.

 The young singer and dancer was branded a gold-digging home-wrecker by the tabloids. Yet after their pounds 6m divorce in 1990 she became a huge commercial success.

Since she announced her planned space mission she has packed in more than 100 concerts. She played the Royal Albert Hall last June, then to crowds in Istanbul, Sofia, Bucharest, Moscow, St Petersburg, Riga and Tallinn, and in concert venues the length and breadth of Japan. She spent Valentine’s Day last year in war-torn Ukraine. She has been all over the Middle East and spent much of 2013 warbling her way around South America.

Her holiday to the International Space Station is reported to be costing $68 million. For the same money you could live in an all-inclusive luxury resort in the Maldives for the next 142 years. Her box office receipts alone could amount to as much as pounds $15m a year, according to calculations from The Sunday Times Rich List, but the astro-jaunt appears to be eating up most of her wealth.

Although there has been speculation that the trip has been part-funded by a Chinese business conglomerate, Brightman is adamant that she has coughed up every penny herself.
“Contractually, I can’t say the amount of what the ticket cost. But I have paid myself for the ticket in full,” she says, lowering her brow in a professorial manner. “In full!”

There is an ethereal otherworldliness about Brightman, yet her doe-like expressions and rambling speech hide the steely control freak inside.

She volunteers the story of how her space trip came to pass — coming close to reprimanding me for not asking sooner. A “dear friend” in California involved in the space business (probably the inventor Dezso Molnar, if internet rumours are to be believed) told her years ago about Sir Richard Branson’s planned Virgin Galactic consumer space flights — prompting her to buy a ticket for the first flight as soon it becomes available.

“Through all this I met a lovely gentleman called Peter Diamandis, who is a co-founder of the space agency I have gone through, Space Adventures,” she says. “A couple of years later he said, ‘Look, would you be interested in going to the International Space Station?’ My first reaction was, ‘It’s amazing that you are asking me and that you think I could be a candidate for this.’ But I wasn’t ready for it, to go through all the medicals. Yet it left that little thing in my head.”

A couple of years later the offer was repeated. She agreed to go through the medical testing program at the Nasa headquarters in Houston, Texas, assuming that as a woman in her fifties she had little chance of passing.

“I got through everything and at a very high level,” she says, flushing with pride. “I was incredibly healthy.”

She then found herself at the Star City training camp in Russia where she was subjected to extreme g-forces, placed in high-altitude chambers, psychologically examined and tested for claustrophobia. Even the physical test, which saw her hooked up to monitors while running on a treadmill, was a breeze.

“I’m a dancer!” she protests. “I am a trained dancer. I was a ballerina when I was younger. There was never any question in that area for me.”

Brightman claims to have been hooked on space since she saw Neil Armstrong walk on the moon when she was eight. It was that night, she says, that she resolved to work really hard at whatever she was good at to go as far as she could in life.

Much of her childhood was spent around planes and gliders. Brightman’s father was an amateur pilot, as was her uncle. During her years on the London stage she would spend many of her mornings off flying to Paris or Amsterdam with a friend who kept a small plane at Elstree, Hertfordshire.

She took some flying lessons, including sessions in a Harrier jump jet. Yet it was all a long way from the training required to fly in a Soyuz rocket — where there is no such thing as a passenger.

There are only three people aboard a Soyuz rocket. Her mission commander, Colonel Sergey Volkov, is a 41-year-old Russian on his third space mission who started training to be a cosmonaut 18 years ago. Space travel runs in the family — his father was one of the cosmonauts on board the space station Mir on the day the Soviet Union collapsed.

The flight engineer is a 38-year-old Dane, Andreas Mogensen, who has been with the European space program since 2009. He has a doctorate from the University of Texas and a master’s degree from Imperial College London. He spent a week last September conducting experiments for Nasa in the American space agency’s underwater deep sea laboratory off Key West, Florida, which is used to simulate conditions in space.

Brightman will have sole responsibility for certain functions of the space station while she is aboard: “It’s to do with pressure. I can’t talk about it — there’s more I need to learn.
“If you are a space flight participant, yes, you don’t do that much but you have to understand the whole vehicle and how it works in case of an off- nominal situation,” she says, adopting what appears to be the jargon of Star City.

“You are learning exactly what they [the cosmonauts] have to learn. It’s a shorter length of time. Of course, you can’t learn everything. But you need a good understanding. When you are in that simulator and you are harnessed in with your helmet, in your suit, it’s serious. Your instinct is to want to have as much knowledge as you can about that vehicle, just for your own safety, and for the people that are with you. It is what it is.”

Training at Star City means 16-hour days. Four hours a day are dedicated to Russian language lessons. Lectures, conducted in Russian, focus on how each component of the Soyuz operates. Her only respite is watching House of Cards in her room late at night. “It’s like conducting an orchestra or performing a show,” she says.

“It may seem a strange analogy but, as I was explaining to one of the professors, it’s the only analogy I have. If you are conducting an orchestra, you can’t just understand a bit of it and a few notes here and there. You have to understand the whole thing from A to Z.”

Roughly once a week they are tested in front of the Star City top brass in a verbal exam. Failure is not an option: “It terrifies me. I haven’t been tested on things since I was a schoolgirl. To be in front of a group of people explaining what happens on a Soyuz control panel or explain the life-support system alarms — it’s pretty scary.”
Every bizarre detail about the trip is relayed meticulously as she perches on an armchair in a Nike running top and leggings.

Brightman’s soprano space performance will happen towards the end of the mission. It takes seven days to acclimatise and she is worried about damaging her voice. In space, all the spare fluid in the body drifts towards the face, filling the sinuses and creating symptoms similar to a heavy cold that could make vocal acrobatics tricky.

She has exchanged emails with Chris Hadfield, the Canadian astronaut who became an internet sensation after performing David Bowie’s Space Odyssey from the International Space Station. He said singing would be fine but filling your lungs in orbit required some preparation. She has also spoken to an Austrian cosmonaut who trained with the Vienna Boys’ Choir “who know their stuff”. He said he sang all the time in space and it was fine.
“I’m doing some zero-g flights very soon,” she said. “I’ll probably do some scales while I’m up there.”

Brightman claims her vocal range has improved as she has aged, but confesses that the power is starting to fade a little. “The voice is a muscle,” she says. “You can be an amazing athlete, but it doesn’t matter how much you train — you get older. The voice doesn’t go, it changes.”

The nature of her space performance has yet to be finalised. It will see her sing with an orchestra, a choir or perhaps another international star back on Earth. A firm of specialist sound engineers has been hired to co-ordinate the time delays and ensure that they can perform in unison.

The surreal nature of being the first soprano in space is something she rarely thinks about while bolting on her helmet and climbing into the Soyuz simulator, she says.
“I feel sort of trained for it, just because of what I do in my life,” she says.
“People in Britain maybe don’t know what I have been doing for the last 20 years, but I have had a pretty full-on career all over the world. That’s what I do. It’s gruelling, but I love it. I feel designed to do it and it works. Without it, I wouldn’t function that well. I wish we had more of a lifetime to get things done, but we have the life that we do.”

Her comparative lack of contemporary success at home seems to sadden her. She concedes that she is “not fashionable” but she cannot control tastes. The tabloid scrutiny that came with her marriage to Lloyd Webber and their divorce has not put her off returning home, she says.

“My family are in Britain. I am British, I have a British passport. It’s my country. What you are describing goes with the territory. It’s an accepted thing. Probably, regardless of divorces from years back, my career would have gone in the way that it has anyway. We all have our paths. We all go into certain areas because we are good at them. The fact that I have travelled the world and had the career that I had would have happened anyway.”

Now most of her earnings are being ploughed into this one peculiar adventure. Her decision is no different, she says, from that of people who reach middle age and then decide to cruise the world or buy a vineyard in France.

“People in their fifties and sixties who have saved some money, they want to do something they wouldn’t have done earlier in their lives. They make some decisions. This was my decision to do this. I know it’s very short. Once I have gone in September for the 10 days, it’s done. But it brings me such a huge amount of happiness.”

                                                               

By Ian Dey
With thanks to The Australian





Lesser-known Scientific Discoveries, And The Women Behind Them



                                                                      



We all know that euphoric feelings come from our central nervous system as it produces endorphins, but do you ever stop to think about who made this discovery, and how? Vanessa Hill is here with the latest episode of BrainCraft to introduce you to Candace Pert, an American neuroscientist who discovered our brain's opiate receptor - where our body's natural painkillers and endorphins bond with cells and make us feel great - way back in 1972. As a graduate student, no less.

You'll often hear about little caps on the end of your DNA called telomeres that protect our chromosomes. As we age, and our cells divide over and over and over again, these telomeres grow shorter, and short telomeres have been associated with age-related illnesses and mortality. 

In 1984, Australia's own Elizabeth Blackburn was instrumental in discovering telomerase, which is an enzyme that actually repairs shortened telomeres. You can probably imagine how massive the impact of this discovery was for medicine, as Vanessa explains in the video above.

Watch the latest episode of BrainCraft to discover the facts behind some of the most significant scientific discoveries in the past few decades, and the amazing women behind them. 
Source: BrainCraft

By Bec Crew

With thanks to Science Alert


 Mad Geniuses: 10 Odd Tales About Famous Scientists

Benjamin Franklin:11 Surprising Facts





March 06, 2015

It Takes More Time To Change A Habit Than You Think



                                                                    






An unconscious crack of the knuckles, an automatic grab for the salt shaker, a seemingly innocuous eye roll in front of the boss. Bad habits are way too easy to come by and, despite whatever quick-remedy self-help cure-all is blowing up the Internet this week, often way too hard to break.
Whether it's that innocent flip of the hair or something much more insidious, behaviors learned over time — and reinforced time and time again — mostly can't be changed in a couple weeks. That was the major takeaway of a study done in 2009, the results of which appeared in the European Journal of Social Psychology.
Certainly, bad habits can be changed. That's the good news. People stop smoking, give up chocolate, get off the couch to start exercising and stop torturing their poor knuckles all the time. Good habits can be formed to replace bad ones, too. In fact, switching out nasty for nice is something scientists and psychologists have been preaching for years.
But changing a lifetime of cola-guzzling, for just an example, in a couple weeks? In 21 days?
Well, it's possible. Maybe. But you'd better plan for it to take a lot longer than that.
"I think that's one of the biggest problems, when people think they can do anything in three weeks," Amy Morin, a psychotherapist, clinical social worker and author of "13 Things Mentally Strong People Don't Do," told MNN. "I think that can set us up for failure."
Number 13 on Morin's list — which first appeared as a blog post on lifehack.org, then went practically viral in other places, with more than 10 million total views — is especially pertinent when it comes to breaking bad habits. Mentally strong people, Morin insists at the bottom of her list, don't expect immediate results.
"When you think about it, even from a logical level, it makes no sense," Morin said of the 21 days to a miracle movement. "We really like our habits. [Breaking them] requires a lot of hard work. I think we underestimate how hard it's going to be. And we overestimate our abilities [to break the habits]."
The paper in the European Journal of Social Psychology studied the length of time it took participants in a study to replace bad habits with good ones. The fastest was an astonishing 18 days. But the average time to change, among the participants who self-reported their results, was not three weeks but closer to three months (66 days). The high end of the spectrum, for replacing bad with good, was a whopping 254 days.
So someone expecting to change a life habit in 21 days — no matter how motivated that someone might be, or who that someone might be — is probably expecting a little too much. Still, huge numbers of books (just check out this Amazon list) all but promise that it can be done in 21 days or so by following a few easy steps. And, of course, by shelling out a few bucks for the book. Plus shipping and handling.
"The more you do it," Patricia A. Farrell, PhD, a clinical psychologist in Englewood, New Jersey, and author of "How to Be your Own Therapist," told WebMD, "the more difficult it is to get rid if it."
It's hard to pinpoint where the idea that it takes just 21 days to kick a bad habit began. Many cite a 1960 work from a plastic surgeon, Dr. Maxwell Maltz, who is regarded as a pioneer in the self-help book industry. His book, "Psycho-Cybernetics: A New Way to Get More Living Out of Life," centers on improving a person's self-image. Some of his advice for breaking bad habits: "To change a habit, make a conscious decision," he said, "then act out the new behavior."
Ahhh, if only it were that simple.
A lot of psychological and biological reasons exist to explain why it's so difficult to lose a bad habit. One important one: Some of our most enjoyable or satisfying actions (say, reaching for the salt or pulling off that oh-so-sweet crack of the knuckles) trigger the production of dopamine in the brain. Dopamine is present when we do it over and over again, creating the habit, Dr. Russell Poldrack, a neurobiologist at the University of Texas at Austin, says in this National Institute of Health feature. And dopamine creates a craving to repeat the behavior. Again and again and again.
So even when the behavior itself does not provide the satisfaction we crave — that salt just isn't making those fries taste any better, and that knuckle-crack was just okay — the body is telling you to keep going for it anyway.
It's important to keep in mind, as experts everywhere will tell you, that kicking a habit, even the nastiest of habits, is doable. Whole books — heck, whole libraries — are available to explain the steps that must be taken to break a bad habit and keep it broken. First off: acknowledging that there is a bad habit. Writing down your goals.  And "put your gym shoes where the remote is," Morin suggests for a start to kicking that TV addiction and getting in shape.
The better news is that trashing those bad habits and replacing them with good ones can be absolutely transformational. Even if it might take a little more than three weeks to do it.
By John Donovan
With thanks to MNN



Bob Dylan Releases A Night They Called It A Day Video



                                                                      




Bob Dylan’s new music video for ‘The Night We Called It A Day’ was once again directed by Australian stuntman/director Nash Edgerton.


                                                                    
Nash has previously directed Dylan’s ‘Must Be Christmas’, ‘Beyond Here Lies Nothing’ and ‘Duquesne Whistle’.

Bob Dylan’s album Shadows in the Night has been a surprise hit around the world. A collection of standards from the 30’s through the 50’s, the album has topped the charts in England and a number of Scandinavian countries.

On Monday, Dylan released a video for the 1941 song The Night We Called It a Day.
Nash has performed his tricks for The Matrix trilogy, The Thin Red Line, Superman Returns, and Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones and Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith. He was the stunt double for Ewan McGregor in the Star Wars movies.

‘The Night They Called It A Day’ was written by Matt Dennis and Tony Adair. 

The song has also been recorded by the likes of Frank Sinatra, Doris Day, June Christy and Diana Krall.

With thanks to Noise 11

                                                                     


And more from Noise 11:


Bob Dylan may have enough new recordings of standards to fill another album.

The singer released Shadows in the Night last month, filled with standards from the 30’s through the 50’s, last month to surprisingly strong sales. Now, producer Daniel Lanois tells The Vancouver Sun (via Rolling Stone) that he’s heard another album worth of material.
“He felt that a lot of that music was written not only by great professional songwriters at the time, but a lot of it was written from the heart, from the wartime and [by] people just pining for a lover. He felt there was a lot of spirit in that music. He felt there was a kind of beauty, a sacred ground for him. After having said all that, we then listened to the music, and I felt everything that he talked about. For one of America’s great writers to say, ‘I’m not gonna write a song; I’m gonna pay homage to what shook me as young boy,’ I thought was very graceful and dignified.”

On Monday, Dylan released the video for the song The Night We Called It a Day from the Shadows in the Night album.
                                                                        
Some related posts:
Bob Dylan: His Website Let's You Direct His First Interactive Music Video

Bob Dylan Turns 73, 8 Fun Facts About Dylan

Arthur Alexander: The Forgotten Songwriter Who Inspired The Beatles, Bob Dylan 

Scribbled Draft Lyrics of Bob Dylan’s “Like a Rolling Stone” Sells for Record $2 Million


Bob Dylan Is Eminently Worthy Of The Nobel Prize In Literature 

Rick Nelson - Some Words of Wisdom 

The Traveling Wilburys: Their History 

The Art of McCartney Project

The Strange, but Mostly True, Story of Laurel Canyon: Gram Parsons And Jim Morrison

'American Pie' Lyrics Sell For $1.2 million In New York


Bob Dylan Named Greatest Songwriter Ahead Of Lennon and McCartney According To Rolling Stone

Gram Parsons And Rick Nelson: Early Pioneers of 'California Dreaming'

Rick Nelson Validated

Traveling Wilburys To Travel Into New Territory - Streaming


Bob Dylan's Sinatra-inspired 'Fallen Angels' Is Another Musical Triumph

Bob Dylan Wins The Nobel Prize In Literature





March 02, 2015

Jason Padgett: Brain Injury Turns Man Into Math Genius


                                                                


                                                                    
In 2002, two men savagely attacked Jason Padgett outside a karaoke bar, leaving him with a severe concussion and post-traumatic stress disorder. But the incident also turned Padgett into a mathematical genius who sees the world through the lens of geometry. 

Padgett, a furniture salesman from Tacoma, Washington, who had very little interest in academics, developed the ability to visualize complex mathematical objects and physics concepts intuitively. The injury, while devastating, seems to have unlocked part of his brain that makes everything in his world appear to have a mathematical structure.

"I see shapes and angles everywhere in real life" — from the geometry of a rainbow, to the fractals in water spiraling down a drain, Padgett told Live Science. "It's just really beautiful." [Album: The World's Most Beautiful Equations


Padgett, who just published a memoir with Maureen Seaberg called "Struck by Genius" (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014), is one of a rare set of individuals with acquired savant syndrome, in which a normal person develops prodigious abilities after a severe injury or disease. Other people have developed remarkable musical or artistic abilities, but few people have acquired mathematical faculties like Padgett's.

Now, researchers have figured out which parts of the man's brain were rejiggered to allow for such savant skills, and the findings suggest such skills may lie dormant in all human brains.

'Struck by genius'
Before the injury, Padgett was a self-described jock and partyer. He hadn't progressed beyond than pre-algebra in his math studies. "I cheated on everything, and I never cracked a book," he said.

But all that would change the night of his attack. Padgett recalls being knocked out for a split second and seeing a bright flash of light. Two guys started beating him, kicking him in the head as he tried to fight back. Later that night, doctors diagnosed Padgett with a severe concussion and a bleeding kidney, and sent him home with pain medications, he said.

Soon after the attack, Padgett suffered from PTSD and debilitating social anxiety. 

 But at the same time, he noticed that everything looked different. He describes his vision as "discrete picture frames with a line connecting them, but still at real speed." If you think of vision as the brain taking pictures all the time and smoothing them into a video, it's as though Padgett sees the frames without the smoothing. In addition, "everything has a pixilated look," he said.

"I see shapes and angles everywhere in real life" — from the geometry of a rainbow, to the fractals in water spiraling down a drain, Padgett told Live Science. "It's just really beautiful." [Album: The World's Most Beautiful Equations


Padgett, who just published a memoir with Maureen Seaberg called "Struck by Genius" (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014), is one of a rare set of individuals with acquired savant syndrome, in which a normal person develops prodigious abilities after a severe injury or disease. Other people have developed remarkable musical or artistic abilities, but few people have acquired mathematical faculties like Padgett's.
Now, researchers have figured out which parts of the man's brain were rejiggered to allow for such savant skills, and the findings suggest such skills may lie dormant in all human brains.


Soon after the attack, Padgett suffered from PTSD and debilitating social anxiety. But at the same time, he noticed that everything looked different. He describes his vision as "discrete picture frames with a line connecting them, but still at real speed." If you think of vision as the brain taking pictures all the time and smoothing them into a video, it's as though Padgett sees the frames without the smoothing. In addition, "everything has a pixilated look," he said.


With Padgett's new vision came an astounding mathematical drawing ability. He started sketching circles made of overlapping triangles, which helped him understand the concept of pi, the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. There's no such thing as a perfect circle, he said, which he knows because he can always see the edges of a polygon that approximates the circle. [Gallery: See Padgett's Amazing Mathematical Drawings


Padgett dislikes the concept of infinity, because he sees every shape as a finite construction of smaller and smaller units that approach what physicists refer to as the Planck length, thought to be the shortest measurable length.

After his injury, Padgett was drawing complex geometric shapes, but he didn't have the formal training to understand the equations they represented. One day, a physicist spotted him making these drawings in a mall, and urged him to pursue mathematical training. Now Padgett is a sophomore in college and an aspiring number theorist.

Padgett's remarkable abilities garnered the interest of neuroscientists who wanted to understand how he developed them.

Beautiful mind
Berit Brogaard, a philosophy professor now at the University of Miami, in Coral Gables, Florida, and her colleagues scanned Padgett's brain with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to understand how he acquired his savant skills and the synesthesia that allows him to perceive mathematical formulas as geometric figures. (Synesthesia is a phenomenon in which one sense bleeds into another.) [Top 10 Mysteries of the Mind]
"Acquired savant syndrome is very rare," Brogaard said, adding that only 15 to 25 cases have ever been described in medical studies.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging measures changes in blood flow and oxygen use throughout the brain. During scans of Padgett, the researchers showed the man real and nonsense mathematical formulas meant to conjure images in his mind.

The resulting scans showed significant activity in the left hemisphere of Padgett's brain, where mathematical skills have been shown to reside. His brain lit up most strongly in the left parietal cortex, an area behind the crown of the head that is known to integrate information from different senses. There was also some activation in parts of his temporal lobe (involved in visual memory, sensory processing and emotion) and frontal lobe (involved in executive function, planning and attention).

But the fMRI only showed what areas were active in Padgett's brain. In order to show these particular areas were causing the man's synesthesia, Brogaard's team used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which involves zapping the brain with a magnetic pulse that activates or inhibits a specific region. When they zapped the parts of Padgett's parietal cortex that had shown the greatest activity in the fMRI scans, it made his synesthesia fade or disappear, according to a study published in August 2013 in the journal Neurocase.

Brogaard showed, in another study, that when neurons die, they release brain-signaling chemicals that can increase brain activity in surrounding areas. The increased activity usually fades over time, but sometimes it results in structural changes that can cause brain-activity modifications to persist, Brogaard told Live Science.
Scientists don't know whether the changes in Padgett's brain are permanent, but if he had structural changes, it's more likely his abilities are here to stay, Brogaard said.

The savant in everyone
So do abilities like Padgett's lie dormant in everyone, waiting to be uncovered? Or was there something unique about Padgett's brain to begin with?

Most likely, there is something dormant in everyone that Padgett tapped into, Brogaard said. "It would be quite a coincidence if he were to have that particular special brain and then have an injury," she said. "And he's not the only [acquired savant]."

In addition to head injuries, mental disease has also been known to reveal latent abilities. And Brogaard and others have done studies that suggest zapping the brains of normal people using TMS can temporarily bring out unusual mathematical and artistic skills.

It's always possible that having savant skills may come with trade-offs. In Padgett's case, he developed fairly severe post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and he still finds it difficult to appear in public.

Yet Padgett wouldn't change his new abilities if he could. "It's so good, I can't even describe it," he said.

Follow Tanya Lewis on Twitterand Google+. Follow us @livescience, Facebook& Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Hedy Lamarr's 101st Birthday Celebrated by Google

John Nash’s Astonishing Geometry

Warp Speed Space Travel A Possibility Thanks To Einstein's Theory Of Relativity 

10 Mathematical Equations That Changed The World

 Mad Geniuses: 10 Odd Tales About Famous Scientists


A Mathematician Has Built A Machine That Can Beat The Odds In Roulette


What Was the Enlightenment?

Quantum Enigma Machines Are Becoming A Reality

Albert Einstein's Legacy
 

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: The Philosopher Who Helped Create the Information Age