That evocative
 phrase shock and awe, coined by the writers of America’s doctrine of 
“rapid dominance” in the Iraq war, could have been applied to Louis 
XIV’s reign in France — twice over. Not only did the 17th-century French
 king consolidate state power into absolute personal rule, ramping up 
the state’s treasury after reforms by his brilliant minister of finance 
Jean-Baptiste Colbert, he fought endless wars to expand France’s 
territory and ensure defensible borders. 
Scarred
 in his youth by the rebellion known as the Fronde, when the entire 
national treasury was dedicated to the royal army, he also prioritised 
domestic security, establishing it with brute force and effective PR. 
Massive spending alternated between military acquisitions during times 
of war and burnishing the image of the king — and so the state — with 
cultural commissions in times of peace. He poured money into 
architecture, painting, sculpture, the decorative arts, music, and 
dance. Into science too, which served a dual role: modernising his war 
machine and producing hydraulic, explosive and mechanised marvels for 
public entertainments.
The most extreme
 example of this double focus was the furniture, including chairs, and 
decorative objects crafted for Louis XIV from solid silver. Over-the-top
 luxury, the chairs were also uncomfortable: suitable, perhaps, for 
objects that were actually part of France’s treasury. Louis had them 
melted down in 1689 to fund his next war. So restricted were the arts 
and crafts in favour of military spending in the following years that 
the even famous Gobelins tapestry factory was closed from 1694 to 1699.
Louis XIV adopted two Greek gods as his 
avatars: Apollo, the god of knowledge and art; and Mars, the god of war.
 Apollo’s emblem, the face of the sun, became his emblem.
And
 the epicentre of all this was Versailles, the palace he transformed 
from his father’s simple hunting lodge into a small city that housed 
thousands, including his entire court and administration. It came to 
define taste and etiquette across Europe.
On
 Friday, a rare exhibition of 130 objets d’art from Versailles opens at 
the National Gallery in Canberra. It follows a chance remark last year 
by the Australian ambassador to France, Stephen Brady, to former Le Point
 editor and Nicolas Sarkozy adviser Catherine Pegard, who is the (often 
controversial) president of the Public Establishment of the Palace, 
Museum and National Estate of Versailles.
After
 seeing a dazzling exhibition from Versailles in Arras, Brady said he 
thought a similar exhibition would go down very well in Australia, where
 ties with France are strong. Hundreds of thousands of Australians visit
 Paris every year; more young Australian men, per capita, than any other
 nationality lost their lives defending Arras in World War I; and the 
Australian government was talking submarine contracts with a French 
company at the time.
To his surprise, 
Brady says, Pegard agreed. “Are you serious?” he recalls saying. She 
was, and after a “dance of the seven veils”, as Brady puts it — several 
meetings to nail down the details — the exhibition was agreed upon. The 
only venue could have been the NGA, Brady says, because he represents 
Australia, not any particular state. As it happens, this period of art 
history is also the specialty of the NGA’s director, Gerard Vaughan.
Beatrix Saule is the grande dame 
of Versailles. A graduate of the Ecole du Louvre, she studied economics 
and law as well as art history, and has worked at the palace for 40 
years. The display in Canberra and an exhibition of Marie Antoinette 
memorabilia going to Japan will be her last major project before 
retirement.
The NGA exhibition is 
Saule’s vision of Versailles. She is so intimate with the place, she has
 instant recall of any names and dates she is asked about.
The French art world still remembers fabulous shows she curated over the years, including Les table royales
 in 1993, which displayed tables and tables full of extravagant china. A
 comment that she has been married to the palace all her life prompts a 
wry aside to her aide about her husband’s opinion on that.
“I
 like to say that Versailles was a product of peace,” she notes, 
referring to the spending that was possible only when the country was 
not at war. “That’s why Versailles took so long to be built: it was 
always starting and stopping.”
Her show
 spans the reigns of Louis XIV, Louis XV and the ill-fated Louis XVI, 
the last absolute monarch of France who was so unceremoniously 
dispatched during the French Revolution. The exhibition demonstrates the
 shifts in taste and fashion over that time, particularly the shift from
 aesthetic shock and awe to the more domesticated personal rooms of the 
later kings and queens.
While anyone 
could view Louis XIV rise from his bed and make his toilette, small 
daily state occasions in themselves, Louis XV and XVI demanded privacy. 
Their rooms were smaller, more warmly decorated. The change in decor 
mirrored the shift in state power. No later building projects would 
rival the stunning Hall of Mirrors, for example: that explosion of 
light, a first in interiors, bookended by salons dedicated to Mars and 
Apollo.
“Louis XV hated to be on show. He was 
shy,” Saule says. “He wanted to be with friends, in good company.” The 
“small apartments”, as his rooms were called, may have been less grand, 
but they were “very refined and always at the latest fashion”.
Saule
 compares the ambience of the different eras. “So Louis XIV, with all 
its marble and gilded objects, its silver objects, was brilliant, but it
 was a little cold,” she observes. “The second atmosphere, more 
intimate, of the reigns of Louis XV and XVI, with wood replacing the 
marble, was more comfortable. Comfort became more important than 
prestige.”
Not that the later kings 
embraced the workaday. A 58cm perfume “fountain” from the wardrobe of 
Louis XV, which we will see in Australia, is an example. Made of glazed 
porcelain in the then-new cracked Chinese style, its stand and lid are 
made of elaborate gilded bronze. The decorations have a marine theme: 
waves, shells and a little lobster on top.
Also
 coming to Canberra are the boudoir chairs of Marie Antoinette and 
Madame de Pompadour, Louis XVI’s queen and Louis XV’s chief mistress, 
respectively. The former, an armchair from the queen’s private 
bedchamber, still has its original upholstery. The latter, a favourite 
of Saule’s, is one of the masterpieces of the exhibition. It was made by
 the most expensive cabinetmaker of the day, she says, and is “a marvel 
of equilibre”, of balance or poise. Its upholstery has been replaced.
At the other extreme of scale is a painting of The Marquis of Sourches and his family
 by Francois-Hubert Drouais, also from the time of Louis XV. It measures
 3.24m by 2.84m and will be transported to Australia on its own, packed 
diagonally to fit, and in foam to protect it against knocks and aircraft
 vibrations. Also coming is a 1.5 tonne statue of Latona and her 
children from one of the fountains, and a 6m tapestry from the series Life of the King by the master-weavers Gobelins.
Saule
 won’t speak about insurance costs — it’s hard to imagine such works are
 even insurable — or about details of transport. When I express surprise
 that only two planes will be carrying the priceless cargo and that the 
risk isn’t spread more widely, she makes a play of signalling devil’s 
horns, warding off bad luck.
Louis 
XIV’s extravagant pursuit of beauty in the building and decoration of 
Versailles was not just a demonstration of the trappings of power or a 
personal penchant for extreme luxury. It also had an economic purpose, 
which his successors maintained. It was intended to change the trade 
balance in France’s favour. Until Louis XIV’s time, all luxury goods 
were imported: silver from Italy and Spain, marble from Italy and 
Flanders, marquetry from Flanders and Germany, paintings from Italy and 
Spain, and so on.
Louis XIV’s idea was 
to set up state-owned manufacturing; and the state, of course, was him. 
He reorganised the Academy of Painting to make it more entrepreneurial. 
He created academies of dance and music. “A lot of academies were 
created at that time,” Saule says, “to establish theoretical training 
and develop the arts in France.” The great composer Lully was in charge 
of music in his time, Rameau in the time of Louis XV.
Gobelins
 was among the companies that came under Louis XIV’s patronage. Sevres, 
the porcelain manufacturer of fine tableware among other things, was 
established with Louis XV’s help. The kings not only bought their 
products but encouraged their nobles to do so too. The royal household 
was the most prestigious showroom in France. “They were renewed very 
quickly because in Versailles the princes and princesses wanted always 
to be up to date,” Saule says. Fashion was born.
It
 wasn’t only about beauty or power. Under Louis XIV, knowledge for 
knowledge’s sake flourished. In the Academy of Science he established, 
one of the disciplines was botany. “In the Trianon, there were enormous 
glasshouses,” Saule says of the palace in Versailles that Louis XIV 
built as a getaway for his mistress, Madame de Montespan, and himself. 
“There were 4000 specimens of plants from all over the world.” Explorers
 and naval officers had orders to bring back what they found.
Under
 Louis XV, the great botanist Bernard de Jussieu classified all the 
plants at Versailles. Saule describes him as the most important 
classifier after Carl Linnaeus: he catalogued plants according to their 
modes of generation, adding to Linnaeus’s charting of physical 
characteristics. Botany did not fare so well under Louis XVI Marie 
Antoinette had the glasshouses torn down and the plants sent to the 
Museum of Natural History in Paris, in order to make way for a 
fashionably pretty English garden.
Hydraulics and explosives technology, 
important for war, were also used in the dazzling garden entertainments 
in Versailles. Water had to be brought there from up to 70km away, and 
ways were invented to feed the elaborate machinery of fountains. The 
fountains were elaborate not just physically but also symbolically. Many
 were based on the Metamorphoses of Ovid. In the bath of the 
nymphs, for example, a curtain of water falls in front of the figures to
 preserve their modesty. Elsewhere, a high, thin stream of water, 
leaving a dying giant’s mouth like a cry, expresses his suffering.
Versailles
 shone with fantastical fireworks displays and impossibly expensive 
illumination. Brilliant lighting during the king’s receptions allowed 
parties to go on into the night. “Only the king with all his wealth 
could afford the number of candles for that,” Saule points out.
She
 also insists that, contrary to popular opinion, philosophers of the 
French Enlightenment were also welcomed to Versailles. They were 
particularly friendly with Madame de Pompadour, Louis XV’s mistress, and
 the Encyclopedie was published with the help of the state 
publisher. “There was no opposition at all between the Enlightenment and
 the court,” she says. Opposition to both court and philosophers came 
from the parlements, which, in those daysmeant provincial appellate courts.
“Sure, the hierarchy and institutions like the public levee and couchee
 gave the court an appearance of being of the past,” Saule adds. “But 
some of the courtiers were important scientists. Louis XIV was 
passionate about astronomy, botany, and medicine. Louis XVI was 
passionate about geography and languages; he spoke about seven 
languages.”
Versailles established the 
ascendancy of French taste and luxury, still an important aspect of 
French exports today. Other innovations continue to resonate in France. 
“It was one of those moments of the highest level of civilisation,” 
Saule says.
“There was a new style of 
conviviality, of politeness. There was the importance of women. French 
gastronomy was created at the time of Louis XVI. The fashions, the 
jewellery ... It was the place where you had to be if you were a VIP in 
France at that time.”
Canberra, for a brief and glittering moment, will give Australians a glimpse of all that.
By Miriam Cosic
Profile of Louis XIV (c. 1709) by Antoine Benoist
With many thanks to The Australian 
Top picture:
Louis XIV (detail, 1701) by Hyacinthe Rigaud; Marie-Antoinette de Lorraine-Habsbourg by Elisabeth Louise Vigee Le Brun.
Next:
Versailles’ Hall of Mirrors was conceived at a time when aesthetic excess was the norm.
Next:
Duchesse de Polignac (1782) by Elisabeth Louise Vigee Le Brun; bust of Louis XIV.
Next:
The Family of the Duke of Penthievre in 1768, also known as The Cup of Chocolate, by Jean-Baptiste Charpentier.
Top picture:
Louis XIV (detail, 1701) by Hyacinthe Rigaud; Marie-Antoinette de Lorraine-Habsbourg by Elisabeth Louise Vigee Le Brun.
Next:
Versailles’ Hall of Mirrors was conceived at a time when aesthetic excess was the norm.
Next:
Duchesse de Polignac (1782) by Elisabeth Louise Vigee Le Brun; bust of Louis XIV.
Next:
The Family of the Duke of Penthievre in 1768, also known as The Cup of Chocolate, by Jean-Baptiste Charpentier.
A "Merbot" Retrieved Artifacts From Louis XIV’s Sunken Flagship "La Lune"
Mysterious 'Man in the Iron Mask' Revealed
Spectacular
Waterfall Takes Over The Palace Of Versailles   
The Musketeers
Dream Eco-Home Of Russian Hemp Tycoon Will Be Noosa’s Priciest Abode
The Musketeers
Dream Eco-Home Of Russian Hemp Tycoon Will Be Noosa’s Priciest Abode




