August 02, 2014

The Power Of The Doodle


                                                                        


                                                                        
LONG dismissed as a waste of time, doodling is getting new respect. 
 
Recent research in neuroscience, psychology and design shows that doodling can help people stay focused, grasp new concepts and retain information. A blank page also can serve as an extended playing field for the brain, allowing people to revise and improve on creative thoughts and ideas.

Doodles are spontaneous marks that can take many forms, from abstract patterns or designs to images of objects, landscapes, people or faces. Some people doodle by retracing words or letters, but doodling doesn’t include note-taking.

“It’s a thinking tool,” says Sunni Brown, an Austin, Texas, author of a new book, “The Doodle Revolution.” It can affect how we process information and solve problems, she says.
Doodling in meetings and lectures helps ease tension for Samantha Wilson, a high-school teacher and graduate student from Southborough, Massachusetts. Drawing squiggly patterns that are “very vegetal, scrolling and organic,” with shaded blocks and spirals in red and blue pen on paper, also allays boredom, she says.

“It looks like I’m spacing out when I’m doodling, but I’m actually making my thoughts come together, solidifying my own ideas,” Ms Wilson says. Doodling recently helped her come up with a theme for a paper in a graduate-school course she is taking, she says.

Scientists in the past thought doodles provided a window into the doodler’s psyche, but the idea isn’t supported by research, says a 2011 study in The Lancet, a medical journal.
Some researchers suspect doodling may help the brain remain active by engaging its “default networks” — regions that maintain a baseline of activity in the cerebral cortex when outside stimuli are absent, the Lancet study says.

People who were encouraged to doodle while listening to a list of people’s names being read were able to remember 29 per cent more of the information on a surprise quiz later, according to a 2009 study in Applied Cognitive Psychology.

Jesse Prinz draws people’s heads to help himself pay attention during lectures and speeches at conferences he attends. The head usually has “something happening to it — an animal on top of it or something coming out of it,” says Dr Prinz, a distinguished professor of philosophy at the City University of New York Graduate Center.

When Dr Prinz returns to the doodle later, “I can reconstruct a lot of what I heard” in the lecture. He compares it to a postcard: a traveller may forget specifics about a trip, but “if you look at that postcard, a lot of things that aren’t depicted in it come back to you,” he says.

Ms Brown, the author, says doodling provides an alternate route to learning for some people. Her professional work includes training company managers to translate ideas and concepts into sketches and drawings in order to spark ideas and improve communication.

Michiko Maruyama, a medical-school student, says she writes down key words during class lectures and later draws “daily doodles” that bring together what she learned.

Ms Maruyama, who attends the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, says she fills gaps in her understanding while she draws images of gastric secretions, hernias and other subjects of study.

“It’s not until I doodle that I think about how everything comes together. I find out what I know and what I don’t know,” she says. When she stopped doodling for a week, her grades went down.

The appearance of a doodle can stimulate ideas for improvement, according to a 2014 study by Gabriela Goldschmidt, a professor emeritus of architecture at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa and a researcher on learning techniques of design. A doodle can spark a “dialogue between the mind and the hand holding a pencil and the eyes that perceive the marks on paper,” the study says.

The study discussed an architecture student who became stalled in his efforts to design a new kindergarten and started a habitual doodle he found pleasurable — writing his signature over and over.

The student soon began to see between the letters of the doodle the outline of a layout for the kindergarten’s three activity spaces. He drew progressively larger versions that eventually became an architectural sketch, the study says.

A doodle also can express emotions too complex for words. Ten doodlers in a four-week study were equipped by researchers to share their sketches on social media, using digital pens and Bluetooth-equipped phones.

Many of the participants’ doodles expressed complex emotions they wouldn’t have shared via written posts or texts, according to the study, presented in 2011 at a Stockholm conference on human-computer interaction.

One 37-year-old teacher, the father of a newborn baby, drew a frazzled-looking brain to convey a feeling of being overwhelmed. A 27-year-old graduate student drew a towering obelisk looming over a childlike figure, to convey the pressure she felt over a deadline for a paper, according to the study, which was led by Lisa Cowan, who earned a Ph.D. in computer science at University of California San Diego and now works as a software developer in Mammoth Lakes, California.

The opportunity to doodle “changed the way people expressed their feelings,” says Nadir Weibel, a research assistant professor in computer science at UCSD and a co-author of the study. “Their pictures communicated more than just a text or a regular photo. They were more personal, more intimate.”

Doodling doesn’t work for all tasks. People who were asked to view and remember a collection of images struggled at the task if they were asked to doodle at the same time, according to a 2012 study published by the University of British Columbia.

The likely reason: doodlers’ visual-processing ability was split between two visual tasks, says the study’s author, Elaine Chan, a former psychology student at the university who is now a researcher at a Vancouver children’s hospital.

Put another way, when doodling and another task use the same cognitive pathways, “you have a traffic jam,” says Ms Brown.

By Sue Shellenbarger


Above: Peggy Lee - The Doodlin' Song
                                                                      
With thanks to The Australian


Optical Illusions In Art




'Fluffy And Feathery' Dinosaurs Were Widespread, Possibly Even Shrank To Become Small Birds


                                                                     


                                                                     
All dinosaurs were covered with feathers or had the potential to grow feathers, a study suggests.

The discovery of 150-million-year-old fossils in Siberia indicates that feathers were much more widespread among dinosaurs than previously thought.
The find "has completely changed our vision of dinosaurs", the lead researcher told BBC News. 

The details have been published in the journal Science.

The creature, called Kulindadromeus zabaikalicus, was about 1m long, with a short snout, long hind legs, short arms, and five strong fingers. 
Its teeth show clear adaptations for chewing plants. 

Until now, fossilised evidence of feathery dinosaurs has come from China and from a meat eating group called theropods. 

The latest discovery, in Russia, is from a completely separate group of plant-eating dinosaurs called ornithischians - which account for half of all dinosaurs. 

Fluffy covering
The find takes the origin of feathers millions of years further back in time than had previously been thought, said Dr Pascal Godefroit of the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences in Brussels, Belgium, who led the research.
"It was a big surprise," he said.

"The fact that feathers have now been discovered in two distinct groups, theropods in China and ornithischians in Russia means that the common ancestor of these species which might have existed 220 million years ago also probably had feathers."
The discovery has "completely changed our vision of dinosaurs", he added.
"Instead of thinking of dinosaurs as dry, scary scaly creatures a lot of them actually had a fluffy, downy covering like feathers on a chick," said co-researcher Dr Maria McNamara of Cork University in Ireland.

Alternative view
So do all the pictures of dinosaurs in children's books need to be redrawn to make creatures like Triceratops, Stegosaurus, Tyrannosaurus rex and the vicious Velociraptor, fluffier and cuter?
Perhaps a little bit, according to Professor Mike Benton, of Bristol University, who was also involved in the work. 
"Our research doesn't mean that all dinosaurs had feathers, especially as adults," he told BBC News. 

"Some will have had feathers as young animals and kept them throughout their lives. Others may have lost feathers as they grew up, and became large enough not to need them, or replaced feathers with scales or relied on bony plates in the skin for protection."
The key point is that dinosaurs were all initially feathered and warm blooded, confirmation of an idea that has prevailed for years, he said. 

"Feathers were used first for insulation and signalling; they only later became adapted for flight."

But Dr Paul Barrett of the Natural History Museum in London, has doubts.

"Most feathers have a branching structure," he told BBC News. 

"Instead these look like little streamers coming from a central plate. No bird has that structure in any part of its plumage and none of the developmental models that biologists use to understand the evolution of feathers includes a stage that has anything like that kind of anatomy."

By Pallab Gosh

With thanks to The BBC

                                                                      


Watch the whole playlist of dinosaur videos here.


Tyrannosaur 'gangs' terrorized ancient landscape


                                                                    
Some 70 million years ago, three tyrannosaurs stalked together across a mud flat in Canada, possibly searching for prey.

The new insight comes from several parallel tyrannosaur tracks unearthed in Canada. The dinosaur tracks provide stronger evidence for a controversial theory: That the fearsome mega-predators hunted in packs.

The ferocious beasts may have "stuck together as a pack to increase their chances of bringing down prey and individually surviving," said study co-author Richard McCrea, a curator at the Peace Region Palaeontology Center in Canada. [See Images of the Giant Tyrannosaur Tracks]

Tyrannosaur hunting
Paleontologists have long debated whether Tyrannosaurus rex and its cousins, such as Albertosaurus, hunted alone or in groups.

While most researchers believe the predators were lone wolves, so to speak, multiple Albertosaurus specimens found in a single bone bed in Canada's Dry Island Buffalo Jump Provincial Park have led some to propose that tyrannosaurs were pack animals.

But finding groups of bones together isn't definitive evidence for pack hunting, because bones can move after death. Other circumstances can cause fossil skeletons to accumulate in one location. For instance, many carnivores wandered individually into classic predator traps, such as the La Brea tar pits in Los Angeles, but probably didn't hunt together in life, McCrea said.

Track marks unearthed
In 2011, a local hunting outfitter and guide, Aaron Fredlund, unearthed two tyrannosaur track marks in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies in British Columbia and then told McCrea's team about the discovery.

The team eventually discovered a patch 197 feet (60 meters) long by 13 feet (4 m) wide filled with footprints from multiple dinosaurs, including tyrannosaurs, other small theropods, and duck-billed dinosaurs called hadrosaurs. These dinosaurs were apparently walking in the silty sediments from an overflowing river and formed the track marks about 70 million years ago. A thick layer of volcanic ash then preserved the marks, McCrea said.

In total, the team found seven tracks that were made by three tyrannosaurs. Though the researchers couldn't identify the specific species, it's likely given the period and location where they were found that Albertosaurus, Gorgosaurus or Daspletosaurus left the tracks, McCrea said.

Though the other dinosaur tracks there are all pointing in random directions, the tyrannosaur footprints are parallel with each other. The tyrannosaurs also left prints of about the same depth in the wet sediments, suggesting they crossed through the area at the same time. (As the mud dries, the depth of footprints becomes shallower.)

The new find may be one of the world's oldest examples of a missed connection. "The hadrosaur footprints are much more shallow, indicating that they came later," possibly just a few hours or days after the tyrannosaurs, McCrea told Live Science.

Pack animals
The new tracks suggest that the tyrannosaurs may have hunted in packs to take down large prey, just as wolves do today.

"An individual wolf would not be able to take out a moose, but a pack of them would," McCrea said.

Similarly, pack hunting could explain how tyrannosaurs could kill hadrosaurs, which are almost as large as the predators, without sustaining horrific injuries, he said.

That doesn't mean tyrannosaurs would have been friendly to one another. In fact, other fossils reveal that the dinosaurs liked to head-bite each other. But the tyrannosaurs may have stuck together to hunt because it increased their odds of survival, McCrea said.

The new discovery also highlights the rough life of these hunters. One of the beasts was missing bones in its left foot, which is in keeping with many of the injuries found on other tyrannosaur specimens, McCrea said.

The trackmarks were described July 22 in the journal PLOS ONE.


By Tia Ghose 
Follow Tia Ghose on Twitter and Google+.  
Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on LiveScience
With thanks to MMN

Update:
How dinosaurs shrank to become small hummingbirds and robins

                                                         

SCIENTISTS have mapped how a group of huge, fearsome dinosaurs evolved and shrank to become small birds such as hummingbirds and robins. 
Comparing fossils of 120 different species and 1,500 skeletal features, especially thigh bones, researchers constructed a detailed family tree for the class of two-legged meat-eaters called theropods and found that they survive to this day as birds.
The steady downsizing and elegant evolution of the theropods is detailed in the journal Science.

“They just kept on shrinking and shrinking and shrinking for about 50 million years,” said study author Michael S.Y. Lee of the University of Adelaide in Australia, who describes this suborder of dinosaurs as “shape-shifters.”

Lee and colleagues created a dinosaur version of the iconic ape-to-man drawing of human evolution. In this version, the lumbering large dinos shrink, getting more feathery and big-chested, until they are the earliest version of birds.

Scientists have previously linked birds to this family of dinosaurs because they shared hollow bones, wishbones, feathers and other characteristics. But the Lee study gives the best picture of how steady and unusual theropod evolution was. The skeletons of theropods changed four times faster than other types of dinosaurs, the study said.

A few members of that dinosaur family did not shrink, including T. Rex, which is more of a distant cousin to birds than a direct ancestor, Lee said.

He said he and colleagues were surprised by just how consistently the theropods shrank over evolutionary time, while other types of dinosaurs showed ups and downs in body size.

The first theropods were large, weighing around 270 kilograms, and roamed about 220 million to 230 million years ago. Around 200 million years ago, when some of the creatures weighed about 165kg, the shrinking became faster and more prolonged, the study said. In just 25 million years, the beasts were slimmed down to barely 45kg. By 167 million years ago, three kg paravians, more direct ancestor of birds, were around.

And 163 million years ago the first birds, weighing less than one kg, probably came on the scene, the study said.

Paul Sereno, a dinosaur researcher at the University of Chicago who wasn’t part of this study, praised Lee’s work as innovative.
The steady size reduction shows “something very strange going on,” Sereno said. “This is key to what went on at the origin of birds.”

People may think bigger is better, but sometimes when it comes to evolution smaller can be better because bigger creatures are more likely to go extinct, Sereno said.
And when the theropods started shrinking there weren’t many other small species that would compete with them, Lee said.

“The dinosaur ancestors of birds found a new niche and a new way of life,” Lee said.
Sereno added, “When you are small, it’s a totally different ball game. You can fly and glide and I think that’s what drove it.”

With thanks to The Australian


Some other related posts:

Dinosaur Bones Found Near Red Sea
The Pelagornis Sandersi: Fossil Find Reveals Largest Flying Bird
Dreadnoughtus: A New Dinosaur Discovery
Shark-munching Spinosaurus Was First-known Water Dinosaur: Study Shows
Pterosaurs With 12 Meters Wingspan Struggled While Taking Off
Velociraptor: Facts About The 'Speedy Thief'
Two Jurassic Mini Mammal Species Discovered in China
Researchers Say They've Found The Biggest Dinosaur Ever
The Brontosaurus Is Officially Back
 Kronosaurus Dinosaur Jaw Found In Outback Queensland
Tiny Bat Wing Dinosaur Discovered
Kunbarrasaurus Ieversi: Australia's Newest Dinosaur 
What Killed The Dinosaurs?
Titanosaurs: The Largest Animals Ever To Walk The Earth 
Timurlengia Euotica: The Missing Link to Tyrannosaurus Rex  
Archaeopteryx: The Transitional Fossil 
When Did The Dinosaurs Become Extinct?
Ancient Sea Monster The ­First Vegetarian Marine Reptile 
Spiclypeus Shipporum: New Dinosaur Species Sported Uniquely Spiked Shield





 








String Theory: The Physics of Master Guitar Playing


                                                                 


                                                                     
How do great guitarists bend a string like Eric Clapton, above, or Jimi Hendrix? One scientist sought to figure out how legendary performers make great music.

"Very good guitarists will manipulate the strings to make the instrument sing," David Robert Grimes, a physicist at Oxford University, in England, who plays guitar and was a member of a band in Dublin, Ireland, said in a statement.

The physics of string instruments is fairly well understood, but "I wanted to understand what it was about these guitar techniques that allows you to manipulate pitch," Grimes said. [The Mysterious Physics of 7 Everyday Things

Grimes, who normally works on mathematical models of oxygen distribution in radiation therapy for cancer, spent his spare time crafting equations for various guitar techniques, including bending (pushing the strings up or down), tapping (hitting the strings), vibrato (moving the wrist back and forth to change a string's tension) and whammy bar action (a mechanical form of vibrato). His findings are detailed today (July 23) in the journal PLOS ONE.

Grimes came up with the equation for string bends experimentally, by measuring the pitch of notes produced when he bent the strings at different angles. He took one of his oldest guitarsto the engineering lab at Dublin City University, where he held a position previously, and asked a colleague to strip it down for his experiments.

"He was a musician too and looked at me with abject horror," Grimes said. "But we both knew it needed to be done — we put some nails into my guitar for science."

Guitar string properties can dramatically affect the pitch of a note, Grimes found. Specifically, the thickness of a string, as well as the amount the string stretches under force (known as the "Young's Modulus"), played important roles.

In guitar playing, a hammer-on is when the player hits a string with their finger to play a note. A pull-off is the opposite: plucking the string off the fingerboard. Grimes figured out that the difficulty of these techniques depends on the heights of the guitar strings above the fingerboard.

These musical phenomena are fairly straightforward, he said, but they're still "a cool way of studying some basic physics principles." These findings could be useful for guitar string manufacturers and people who model digital instruments, he added.

Grimes said he has a few guitar heroes of his own, who have mastered the techniques he studies. Still, "I think the only person I ever wrote fan mail to was Brian May of Queen," he admitted.

Picture above: Joe Satriani 

By Tanya Lewis on Twitter and Google+

The Satanic Leaf-tailed Gecko - Master of Camouflage


                                                                  



“What’s in a name?” Shakespeare once asked, apparently in Romeo and Juliet, which I just learned from Google because I did not pay attention in that class in college. “That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” I think this means that a name doesn’t matter for much, because it’s just, like, words or something.

But don’t tell that to Madagascar’s most excellently named, not to mention most beautiful, critter: the satanic leaf-tailed gecko (sorry, aye-aye, but you’re a close second on both the name and the beauty). That’s its actual name, and you can be damn sure the gecko is proud of it. But monikers aside, this masterfully camouflaged little lizard, with a leafy tail complete with missing chunks that look to have rotted away, is a testament to natural selection.

Known to scientists as Uroplatus (meaning “flat tail”) phantasticus (meaning “good lord what is this thing and why is it looking at me like that?”), the satanic leaf-tailed gecko is one of 14 species in its genus, including the mossy leaf-tailed gecko, which long ago renounced Satan in favor of Mosses. These geckos are found only in Madagascar, and emerge only at night to hunt.

It’s thought that they’re after mostly insects, yet little is known about their diet in the wild. In captivity, though, “satanic leaf-tailed geckos feed on almost everything they can overwhelm, including crickets, flies, spiders, cockroaches, and snails,” said herpetologist Frank Glaw of the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology. “Large species like Uroplatus fimbriatus and Uroplatus giganteus even accept young mice.”

And the satanic leaf-tailed gecko has its own predators aplenty, including birds and snakes and rats. If they decide to stand their ground, they stare down their foes, and “suddenly widely open their mouths, emit loud cries, show the reddish tongue and mucosa and try to bite,” said Graw (it’s no wonder locals are very much afraid of the gecko—as they are of the aye-aye, as it happens). They’ll also flash their tails to confuse the potential predator, but should that fail, they can leap deftly from branch to branch or straight down to the leaf litter.

But, really, it’s best to just avoid being seen in the first place. And that, of course, is where their amazing camouflage really comes into play. Not only does the gecko’s tail look like a dead leaf, so too does its body.

“A light line along the back together with leaf-vein-like lines and skin structures on the body can complete the perfect imitation of a dead leaf,” said Graw. And their coloration is incredibly varied, as you can see in the gallery above, coming “in all shades of beige, grey and brown, often with a mixture of lichen-like or even greenish spots which look very much like moss. This variability ensures that they have an adapted outfit for the different structures in their habitat.”

Reinforcing this camouflage for the satanic leaf-tailed geckos is their behavior: They’ll spend the day hanging motionless off of branches or snuggling among dead leaves, often twisting their leafy tails around their bodies. Other larger species in the satanic’s genus have still another strategy for sleeping safely during the day, flattening their bodies against tree trunks and limbs, making good use of those famously grippy feet (a magic power derived, by the way, from countless hair-like structures that allow some geckos to even stick to inverted glass panes, not that nature would ever ask them to). Fringes and flaps along the edges of their bodies help erase their outlines and shadows, dissolving the geckos into the bark.

“Both strategies, to mimic dead leaves or tree bark, are obviously very successful to bluff diurnal predators that rely on their vision, especially birds,” said Graw. “A similar strategy has evolved in the Australian leaf-tailed geckos that resemble Uroplatus, although they are not closely related. However, it remains remarkable that these strategies have not evolved more often among geckos from other parts of the world.”
Dance Dance Evolution

But how on Earth could such ridiculously and perfectly complex camouflage evolve in the first place? Surely, some guiding hand in the sky must have said, “Yes, that’s a lovely outfit, let’s go with that one.” In reality, the satanic leaf-tailed gecko and its related species are some of the most striking manifestations of Darwin’s principle of natural selection.

First of all, it’s a harsh fact of life that some animals produce more offspring than can possibly survive. (It’s particularly harsh when you consider something like Australia’s mouse-like marsupial antechinus, whose males have so much sex that they go blind and die. They’re lucky to even make it that far, though: Females give birth to more young than they have teats. The strongest make it to a teat and survive, the others perish and tumble off of their mother.) Even if the organism can manage to not get picked off by the predator, the environment isn’t necessarily suited to nurture every single individual. There’s a certain capacity.

Offspring are born with variations, just as you and your siblings look and behave differently. And these variations either end up suiting the organism better or worse to its environment. Critters with the magic variations—say, looking a bit like the leaves they live in—have a better chance of surviving (by being more likely to escape a predator’s notice) to pass these genes along. Thus does a species adapt ever so slowly to its environment over evolutionary time. It’s been happening on Earth for billions of years. The satanic leaf-tailed gecko just happens to be one of its more fantastically molded triumphs.

So well done, satanic leaf-tailed gecko, you’ve earned the most hyperbolic yet simultaneously accurate name in the animal kingdom. Shakespeare would be proud … or disappointed. I still really have no clue what he was talking about with the whole names thing.

Browse the full Absurd Creature of the Week archive here. Have an animal you want me to write about? 

By Matt Simon

Email: matthew_simon@wired.com  or ping me on Twitter at @mrMattSimon.


More pictures and information at Wired. Many thanks for the original article.







Bedazzled By The Bard


                                                                 


                                                                   
Widely regarded as the world’s greatest dramatist, the English poet, playwright and actor William Shakespeare wrote 38 plays and more than 150 sonnets, and his works have been translated into every major living language. 

Born in Stratford-upon-Avon, England, in 1564, this year marks the 450th anniversary of the Bard’s birth.

In addition to his plays being studied and performed around the world, Shakespeare also left an indelible mark on the English language. His vocabulary was famously vast, at over 17,000 words around four times larger than the average educated person of the period. It is claimed that around 1,700 of these words were invented by Shakespeare himself – an absolutely staggering figure.

Hundreds of these words are still in use today. And it’s not just the sheer volume of new words that Shakespeare introduced that is surprising, but quite how modern-sounding some of them are: it’s hard to believe that “academe”, “madcap”, “obscene” and “zany” all date from the late sixteenth century (all of which can be found in Shakespeare’s early comedy, Love's Labour's Lost).

And there are many others: “bedazzled” (The Taming of the Shrew), “circumstantial” and “marketable” (both from As You Like It), “gossip” (The Comedy of Errors), “rant” (Hamlet), “equivocal” (All's Well That Ends Well), “swagger” (Henry IV, Part 2) and “fashionable” (Troilus and Cressida).

Then there are the numerous compound words that he coined – “bloodstained” (Titus Andronicus), “cold-blooded” (King John), “green-eyed” (The Merchant of Venice) – as well as countless everyday phrases such as “Mum's the word” (Henry VI, Part 2), “Vanish into thin air” (Othello), “Eaten out of house and home” (Henry V, Part 2) and "A wild goose chase" (Romeo and Juliet). And did you know that the first written instance of "Knock knock! Who's there?" comes from Act 2, Scene 3 of Macbeth?

(If you’d like to find out more about how language evolves in Shakespeare’s work, you might be interested in our BA English degree. Developed by Goldsmiths, University of London, it features a course on Shakespeare which not only examines his use of language but also the enduring nature of his art.)

By Peter Quinn

With thanks to London International

Thanks to GR for sending it to me. 

Related:
'The Great Gatsby': Seven Life Lessons

The Top 10 Shakespeare Scenes 

William Shakespeare: The World As He Made It

Shakespeare’s World Revealed In 400-year-old Handwriting

The Book Of Kells: A Medieval Treasure


William Shakespeare Folios Net $3.6 Million At Christie’s

Antoine de Saint-ExupĂ©ry’s Press Pass for the Spanish Civil War Found 


Palace Found At Tintagel, Fabled Birthplace Of King Arthur

Ancient Egyptian Works To Be Published Together In English For The First Time

The Untold Truth About The Holy Grail
 



Antarctic Leopard Seal - Face-Off With a Deadly Predator


                                                               



Paul Nicklen describes his most amazing experience as a National Geographic photographer - coming face-to-face with one of Antarctica's most vicious predators. 
Little wonder it has has so many views!!

Thanks to Claudette for sending me this.